Dynamic

PM2 vs Supervisord

Developers should use PM2 when deploying Node meets developers should use supervisord when they need to manage and supervise long-running processes in production or development environments, especially for applications that must stay alive (e. Here's our take.

🧊Nice Pick

PM2

Developers should use PM2 when deploying Node

PM2

Nice Pick

Developers should use PM2 when deploying Node

Pros

  • +js applications to production servers to ensure high availability, manage multiple instances for load balancing, and simplify application lifecycle management
  • +Related to: node-js, javascript

Cons

  • -Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

Supervisord

Developers should use Supervisord when they need to manage and supervise long-running processes in production or development environments, especially for applications that must stay alive (e

Pros

  • +g
  • +Related to: python, systemd

Cons

  • -Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

The Verdict

Use PM2 if: You want js applications to production servers to ensure high availability, manage multiple instances for load balancing, and simplify application lifecycle management and can live with specific tradeoffs depend on your use case.

Use Supervisord if: You prioritize g over what PM2 offers.

🧊
The Bottom Line
PM2 wins

Developers should use PM2 when deploying Node

Disagree with our pick? nice@nicepick.dev