Dynamic

Ninject vs StructureMap

Developers should learn Ninject when building meets developers should learn structuremap when working on legacy . Here's our take.

🧊Nice Pick

Ninject

Developers should learn Ninject when building

Ninject

Nice Pick

Developers should learn Ninject when building

Pros

  • +NET applications that require maintainable, testable code through dependency injection, such as in enterprise-level web services, desktop applications, or complex business logic systems
  • +Related to: dependency-injection, inversion-of-control

Cons

  • -Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

StructureMap

Developers should learn StructureMap when working on legacy

Pros

  • +NET projects (especially
  • +Related to: dependency-injection, inversion-of-control

Cons

  • -Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

The Verdict

Use Ninject if: You want net applications that require maintainable, testable code through dependency injection, such as in enterprise-level web services, desktop applications, or complex business logic systems and can live with specific tradeoffs depend on your use case.

Use StructureMap if: You prioritize net projects (especially over what Ninject offers.

🧊
The Bottom Line
Ninject wins

Developers should learn Ninject when building

Disagree with our pick? nice@nicepick.dev