Crowdin vs Smartling

Developers should use Crowdin when building applications or websites that require internationalization (i18n) and localization (l10n) for global audiences, as it streamlines the translation process and reduces manual overhead meets developers should learn and use smartling when building or maintaining software for international audiences, as it simplifies the technical aspects of localization, such as string extraction, translation memory, and over-the-air updates for mobile apps. Here's our take.

Crowdin

Nice Pick

Developers should use Crowdin when building applications or websites that require internationalization (i18n) and localization (l10n) for global audiences, as it streamlines the translation process and reduces manual overhead

Pros

• It is particularly valuable for agile development teams that need to sync translations with code updates, manage large-scale projects with multiple languages, or collaborate with external translators and stakeholders in a centralized system
• Related to: internationalization, localization

Cons

• Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

Smartling

Developers should learn and use Smartling when building or maintaining software for international audiences, as it simplifies the technical aspects of localization, such as string extraction, translation memory, and over-the-air updates for mobile apps

Pros

• It is particularly valuable in agile development environments where content changes frequently, as it integrates with CI/CD pipelines and version control systems like Git
• Related to: localization, internationalization

Cons

• Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

The Verdict

These tools serve different purposes. Crowdin is a tool while Smartling is a platform. We picked Crowdin based on overall popularity, but your choice depends on what you're building.

The Bottom Line

Crowdin wins

Based on overall popularity. Crowdin is more widely used, but Smartling excels in its own space.