Applicant Tracking System vs Manual Hiring Process

Developers should learn about ATS when involved in HR tech, job application processes, or building integrations for recruitment platforms meets developers should learn about the manual hiring process to understand how hiring decisions are made in many companies, especially when applying for jobs or participating in recruitment. Here's our take.

Applicant Tracking System

Nice Pick

Developers should learn about ATS when involved in HR tech, job application processes, or building integrations for recruitment platforms

Pros

• Understanding ATS is crucial for optimizing resumes to pass automated screening, as many companies use these systems to filter candidates based on keywords and formatting
• Related to: resume-parsing, job-board-integration

Cons

• Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

Manual Hiring Process

Developers should learn about the manual hiring process to understand how hiring decisions are made in many companies, especially when applying for jobs or participating in recruitment

Pros

• It is relevant for roles in human resources, talent acquisition, or management, and helps in preparing for interviews by anticipating human-centric evaluation criteria
• Related to: resume-screening, interview-techniques

Cons

• Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

The Verdict

These tools serve different purposes. Applicant Tracking System is a tool while Manual Hiring Process is a methodology. We picked Applicant Tracking System based on overall popularity, but your choice depends on what you're building.

The Bottom Line

Applicant Tracking System wins

Based on overall popularity. Applicant Tracking System is more widely used, but Manual Hiring Process excels in its own space.