Automated Accessibility Testing vs Manual Accessibility Audits

Developers should learn and use automated accessibility testing to ensure their applications are usable by people with disabilities, which is often a legal requirement (e meets developers should learn manual accessibility audits to ensure their products are usable by people with disabilities, which is often a legal requirement (e. Here's our take.

Automated Accessibility Testing

Nice Pick

Developers should learn and use automated accessibility testing to ensure their applications are usable by people with disabilities, which is often a legal requirement (e

Pros

• g
• Related to: web-accessibility, wcag-compliance

Cons

• Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

Manual Accessibility Audits

Developers should learn manual accessibility audits to ensure their products are usable by people with disabilities, which is often a legal requirement (e

Pros

• g
• Related to: web-accessibility, wcag-guidelines

Cons

• Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

The Verdict

Use Automated Accessibility Testing if: You want g and can live with specific tradeoffs depend on your use case.

Use Manual Accessibility Audits if: You prioritize g over what Automated Accessibility Testing offers.

The Bottom Line

Automated Accessibility Testing wins

Developers should learn and use automated accessibility testing to ensure their applications are usable by people with disabilities, which is often a legal requirement (e